Skip to main content
Home

Ireland’s PPP pipeline is accelerating – implications for Boards and CFOs

With sustained investment required across transport, housing, education and justice, Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) continue to play a central role under Project Ireland 2040.

Business people having a meeting in the conference room

Ireland’s PPP pipeline is accelerating – implications for Boards and CFOs

Ireland is entering a critical phase of infrastructure delivery. With sustained investment required across transport, housing, education and justice, Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) continue to play a central role under Project Ireland 2040.

However, for Boards and CFOs, PPPs are no longer simply a procurement route. They represent long-term financial, operational and governance commitments that extend well beyond project delivery.

A growing pipeline – with increasing complexity

A number of major PPP projects are progressing or expected in the coming years, including:

  • Transport infrastructure, such as MetroLink, which is expected to incorporate PPP elements
  • Continued rollout of social housing PPP bundles
  • Ongoing use of PPP models across education and justice sectors

At the same time, updated Infrastructure Guidelines are evolving the previous Public Spending Code framework, increasing expectations around project appraisal, delivery assurance and value for money.

What matters at Board and CFO level

While PPPs can offer clear benefits, they also introduce significant complexity. In our experience, Boards and CFOs are increasingly focused on five key areas:

1. Balance sheet and financial reporting

PPP arrangements require careful assessment of:

  • On- or off-balance sheet treatment
  • Implications for leverage and banking covenants
  • Investor and stakeholder perception

These accounting outcomes can materially influence how organisations are viewed by lenders, investors and public sector counterparts.

2. Funding environment and cost of capital

The financing landscape for PPPs has changed:

  • Higher interest rates
  • Tighter lending conditions
  • Increased scrutiny of financial models and assumptions

This places greater pressure on project viability and long-term returns.

3. Risk transfer versus risk retention

While PPPs are designed to transfer risk, the reality is often more nuanced.

Boards are increasingly scrutinising:

  • Whether construction, demand and lifecycle risks are genuinely transferred
  • Where contingent liabilities may remain
  • How contractual risk allocation aligns with commercial reality

4. Market capacity and procurement dynamics

The Irish PPP market continues to face:

  • A limited pool of bidders
  • Rising bid and delivery costs
  • Capacity constraints across contractors and supply chains

These dynamics have implications for competition, pricing and value for money.

5. Lifecycle and handback risk

With Ireland’s first PPP projects approaching handback from 2027 onwards, attention is shifting to:

  • Asset condition and lifecycle obligations
  • Contract expiry and dispute risk
  • Transition planning and cost exposure

This phase requires the same level of financial discipline and oversight as project inception.

The role of audit and assurance

In this environment, independent audit and assurance is not simply a compliance exercise. It is a core element of governance and risk management.

Boards and CFOs increasingly rely on assurance to:

  • Validate financial models and assumptions
  • Assess accounting and reporting implications
  • Strengthen governance and control frameworks
  • Identify financial and operational risks across the project lifecycle

Looking ahead

As PPP activity accelerates, the challenge for organisations is no longer just securing projects - it is managing their financial, operational and governance implications over decades.

For Boards and CFOs, success will depend on informed oversight, disciplined risk management and access to high-quality independent assurance.

How Azets supports PPP stakeholders

Azets Ireland supports PPP stakeholders across the full project lifecycle - from bid stage through to operation and handback - with a focus on audit, compliance and independent assurance.

A key differentiator in our approach is our understanding of the multi‑stakeholder nature of PPPs.

PPP structures must meet the needs of multiple parties, including:

  • Sponsors and investors
  • Lenders
  • Public sector bodies
  • Operators and contractors

Each group has distinct reporting requirements, risk priorities and governance expectations.

We have designed our audit and communication approach specifically to address this complexity ensuring that:

  • Financial reporting is robust, transparent and decision‑useful
  • Information is aligned across stakeholder groups
  • Boards and CFOs receive clear, consistent insight to support effective decision‑making

This enables us to go beyond traditional audit delivery and provide assurance that reflects both the technical complexity and practical realities of PPP arrangements.

If you would like to discuss your current or upcoming PPP projects, or understand how these considerations may impact your organisation, please get in touch with our team.

Dave Mcgarry
David McGarry

Partner | Head of Audit & Assurance

View profile

Our latest news

Find a specialist

Join our team